A Critique of the The Willowbank Report: February 17, in theological reflection Lausanne Occasional Paper 2 In the Lausanne Paper, you have a presentation of a strategy developed to address the complexities of cross cultural evangelism.
Grouped together in one paper is a reflection of 17 papers that pinpoint some of the delicate areas of cross cultural evangelism. The committee that was assembled to tackle this area, intelligently and carefully, exposes some common characteristics that exist in this context.
We find that our culturally conditioned presuppositions are being challenged and our questions corrected. In fact, we are compelled to reformulate our previous questions and to ask fresh ones.
So the living interaction proceeds. You find that the committee takes the time to relax their own presumptions to better engage the context in which they are studying. They assert, Sometimes people resist the gospel not because they think it false but because they perceive it as a threat to their culture, especially the fabric of their society, and their national or tribal solidarity.
To some extent this cannot be avoided. Jesus Christ is a disturber as well as a peacemaker. He is Lord, and demands our total allegiance.
Still today Jesus challenges many of the cherished beliefs and customs of every culture and society. The Lausanne Movement counteracts the myth that some come to the table with by emphasizing the features of culture that can be transposed with the message of Christ.
I personally believe this may be one of the greatest tools for cross cultural or evangelism that I have read. The concepts introduced here placed high priority on the integrity of the Scripture without being extreme dogmatist. Due to the nature of conversion we must at times handle it with kid gloves but adult minds.
Because of the radical nature of conversion, we see the need for a total change but at the end of the day we must be clear that it is up to Christ to work through the wiring of an individual. The insight that the Lausanne Movement developed through this paper provided ways to handle the delicate issues without disrespecting in the same tone.
I think the Lausanne Movement also profusely dealt with the culture of church not being so preoccupied with making clones but making indigenous churches and believers that served God in a familiar context. I believe this adds a valid reason why we must engage culture as we engage others with the gospel.
Without properly adjusting to the culture we could possibly offend the very one we are going to evangelize with the gospel. We in turn would shoot ourselves in the foot before we even get started.
The church is in danger of doing the same thing with regards to Hip Hop. Even worse, this narrow-mindedness often leads to a failure to accept the hip hoppers who are in Christ and their ministry contributions.
Through this presentation they have defunct my own presuppositions and provided me with a Socratic mindset to find new ways to engage other cultures and ethnicities.This article critique will look at the Lausanne Occasional Paper 2 of the Willowbank Report which addresses the Consultation of the Gospel and Culture.
THE KEY ELEMENTS OF THE WILLOWBANK REPORT The Willowbank report starts off with an introduction. This introduction tells the reader of the goal of the report. The Willowbank Report is comprised of 9 different sections that outline the Gospel and its influence upon culture as well as the significant impact that culture has on the Gospel.
|Article Critique | william maitre - rutadeltambor.com||Today this discussion continues yet we would be remiss if we failed to acknowledge that we stand of the shoulders of those who work we study today. Were it not for their faithfulness in crossing cultures to reach the other sheep not of this fold John|
|Article Critique | william maitre - rutadeltambor.com||Consultation on Gospel and Culture, it is very obvious that one of the main obstacles for the Word of God to conquer is the people who set out to bring forth that very same word.|
|Search The Blog||In a committee of sorts was assembled to tackle just that. It was called the Lausanne Congress, and its purpose was to meet and discuss world evangelizations.|
|A Critique of the The Willowbank Report: Consultation on Gospel and Culture | revolutionary intent||Conclusion Introduction The process of communicating the gospel cannot be isolated from the human culture from which it comes, or from that in which it is to be proclaimed.|
The Willowbank Report first tries to make light of the biblical basis of culture. article critique 1: the willowbank report Introduction The Willowbank Report: Consultation on Gospel and Culture is a report of a consultation of 33 people who are mission minded in their attempt to study Gospel and Culture.
This group consists of theologians, anthropologists, linguists, missionaries and pastors from six continents (pg. 1). This report, divided into nine sections dealing with culture, the Gospel, and how the two interact with and influence each other.
This review will interact with the ideas expressed and offer the author’s reflections and about those ideas. Feb 17, · A Critique of the The Willowbank Report: Consultation on Gospel and Culture Posted: February 17, in theological reflection.
2. Lausanne Occasional Paper 2. In the Lausanne Paper, you have a presentation of a strategy developed to address the complexities of cross cultural evangelism.
Grouped together in one paper . Article Critique 1: The Willowbank Report by Jalen Rose GLST Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary Dr. Jeff Brawner July 17, article critique 1: the willowbank report Introduction The Willowbank Report: Consultation on Gospel and Culture is a report of a consultation of 33 people who are mission minded in their attempt to study.