Communal Harmony Seers assure Muslims, offer shelter in temples Nov 18,Times of India Reacting to reports of Muslims of Ayodhya feeling unsafe due to gathering of VHP activists for Dharm Sabha on November 25, the seers and temple mahants have assured support and security to Muslims and said that Muslims can take shelter in temples if they feel any insecurity. Assuring Muslims of their security, Hindu seers said that the doors of temples are open for Muslims to take shelter in case they feel any threat or insecurity. Mahant Dharam Das, a litigant of Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit case, said Muslims should not feel insecure in any situation and the sadhus will ensure their protection. Ayodhya-Faizabad are cities of Ganga Jamuni tehzeeb, so no one will be harmed.
John Rollins provides a transnational perspective on how the US approaches homeland security. As US economic, political, social, and environmental interests become more global, so have security threats. The United States, as the most technologically advanced and globally connected nation on earth, is especially at risk to systematic or single-incident disruptions.
The US no longer has the geographic or economic luxury of approaching security issues from a domestic or international perspective.
Based in part on the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in and the deficiencies observed in effectively addressing international security matters during World War II inthe National Security Act was passed to better align the missions and goals of the military, foreign policy, and intelligence communities.
The surprises associated with the start of the Korean War inthe Iraq invasion of Kuwait inand the bombing of the Oklahoma City Murrah Federal building inled to agency reorganizations and redistribution of resources between the international and domestic security activities.
Similarly, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has been reorganized numerous times after perceived failures in responding to natural disasters. Often the philosophical and organizational changes approved by policymakers assumed that the next significant event would likely take the form of the most recent incident.
Many global risks could emerge over decades rather than months or years. Al-Qaeda first targeted US interests when attempting to attack service members in Yemen in In the intervening period, between and September 10,the terrorist group successfully carried out numerous other attacks against US global interests.
This reaction, and the subsequent Global War on Terror, came at high cost both in terms of blood and treasure and were undertaken during a very emotional and highly politicized environment. In hindsight, it could also be argued that while the attacks were significant and catastrophic, they were not indicative of a persistent threat challenging the American way of life.
Furthermore, some might suggest that the US response to this tragedy has contributed to a misunderstanding of the diversity of threats found in the global environment and the creation of a sometimes-ineffective approach to assessing risk.
However, there have also been examples where the unclear responsibilities of applicable organizations and the need to address prospective threats from a domestic or international perspective have led to inefficiencies, actual and near tragedy, and continuing challenges in detecting, responding, or recovering from a security-related issue.
Response and recovery efforts and offers of international assistance associated with Hurricane Katrina of and the B.
For most of these incidences failures were assessed, additional resources were authorized, reorganizations implemented, and new policies were developed to ensure that the next time a similar incident occurs a more robust system would be in place to detect prospective anomalies.
However, the conceptual approach to detecting and responding to threats remains the same: Future threats directed at US interests are increasingly less likely to observe and be constrained by national borders or the veil of geographic protection enjoyed since World War II.
Due to the complexity of current and emerging threats and US interconnectedness with global financial, infrastructure, and security ecosystems, the nation is increasingly at risk of falling prey to man-made or naturally occurring incidences.
Failed and failing states and ungoverned areas; sophisticated criminal syndicates; changes to the climate; the ease of manufacturing and surreptitious delivery of harmful explosive, biological, and technological devices with increasingly lethal results; and dwindling life-sustaining resources are but a few of the near- and long-term transnational security challenges the nation will be required to confront.
Traditionally stable state powers the United States relies upon to identify risks and assist with addressing global security issues of mutual interest are encountering challenges in maintaining viability.
Some of the worst slides this year were recorded in Western Europe as the economic crisis began to impact on countries such as Ireland and Greece.
What might have been understood, but not adequately acted upon until after the terrorist attacks of September 11,was that a threat to US interests can be manifested from anywhere in the world and have both domestic and international implications.
Such threats can have very real safety, economic, and societal consequences if security leaders are unable to appreciate the transnational implications accompanying risks found throughout the world.UN News produces daily news content in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Kiswahili, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish, and weekly programmes in Hindi, Urdu and Bangla.
Our multimedia service, through this new integrated single platform, updates throughout the day, in text, audio and video – also making use of quality images and other media from across the UN system.
Your source for local news, sports, high school sports and weather in and around Jefferson City, Columbia, Fulton and the Lake of the Ozarks.
All of Mid-Missouri.
Protecting the United States from terrorism is the founding mission of the Department of Homeland Security. While America is stronger and more resilient as a result of a strengthened homeland security enterprise, threats from terrorism persist and continue to evolve.
Progress Made Since 9/ Protecting the United States from terrorism is. This website provides responsible criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report by senior military, intelligence and government officials. It provides experienced professional opinions about the terrorist attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon.
The Evolution of Terrorism Since 9/11 But the decentralization of terrorism also poses a variety of new threats.
which is why the only successful attacks in the United States since 9/ Racial Profiling by Police is Not a Problem - Racial profiling is a controversial topic in today’s society. Many minorities feel targeted by governmental officials such as police officers and U.S.