Islam argues for the sanctity of life and is opposed to abortion. But it does argue that it is permissible in certain circumstances.
In order to provide Fox News Web site users with a better understanding Religious and ethical arguements in favour the ethical and moral debate surrounding stem-cell research, the editors and research department at the Fox News Channel prepared the following primer.
The Case Against Stem Cell Research Opponents of research on embryonic cells, including many religious and anti-abortion groups, contend that embryos are human beings with the same rights — and thus entitled to the same protections against abuse — as anyone else.
They believe life starts at the moment of conception, when a sperm fertilizes an egg, since a distinct organism has come into being.
Thus the destruction of an embryo is the destruction of a human life. Anti-abortion groups also oppose research on stem cells derived from aborted fetuses. They reject the argument that since abortion is already legal and women will have them, that stem cells should be used from aborted fetuses because they would otherwise go to waste.
Pope John Paul II has offered one argument designed to address just these sorts of questions when he wrote: A free and virtuous society, which America aspires to be, must reject practices that devalue and violate human life at any stage from conception until natural death.
Some groups that do not oppose abortion are uneasy about the prospect of studying tissues derived from aborted fetuses or discarded embryos. Many ethicists and scientists also oppose embryonic research.
In a July statement, bioethicists, scientists and legal scholars said they objected to embryonic stem cell research on the grounds that such research is both unethical and unnecessary. Some of these critics argue that recent research showing that adult stem cells may be more versatile than previously thought, say scientists may soon be able to derive stem cells from adults.
Those who are opposed to this research also believe that their tax dollars should not go to supporting the research regardless of whether or not the research is permitted.
The Case for Stem Cell Research Most critics of the embryo research ban contend that week-old blastocysts are not human beings, and that destroying those embryos does not constitute killing. At one week, embryos are merely a cluster of cells and not deserving of the protections afforded to others, they say.
When conceived naturally, a blastocyst has not been implanted in the uterus by that time. Most scientists argue that an embryo is not a person until it is at least two weeks old, when it develops a so-called primitive streak, the first evidence of a nervous system.
A number of religious groups support embryonic stem cell research, and many Protestant sects and most Islamic and Jewish theologians also do not consider a young embryo to be a human being.
Some critics of an embryo research ban point out that funding is already permitted for research on more advanced, aborted fetuses. Advocates of embryo research say that the potential medical benefits of the research outweigh moral concerns about the embryo.
They worry that a ban might cut off scientific opportunities "to those most qualified to make dramatic advances towards using stem cells for the treatment of disease," according to one group in favor of the research. Further, supporters of the research argue that federal involvement would increase the pool of talented scientists who could study the cells, and thus accelerate the pace of the research.
Lifting the ban on research would also, they say, allow the government to gain better oversight of embryonic research; studies conducted with federal funds are subjected to rigorous peer review and ethical oversight, while private research need not follow such standards.
Thus the oversight could lead to restricting research that lawmakers find objectionable, such as studies that attempt to create human clones, for example, although many supporters of stem cell research also favor cloning research.
Federal funding advocates say stem cell research will continue with or without government funding, and say that the government should regulate that research — especially since they believe information about advances in stem cell research should flow freely into the public domain.The issue of abortion has been a very debated one and it inevitably acquires moral and religious undertones.
Know the arguments for and against abortion. Mid-Day Ethical Arguments For and.
Scott, what he means is that the conditions in the rest of the world will cause the number of people seeking asylum to rise and fall. At the moment, the conditions in Afghanistan and other parts of the world are making people flee their homes. Recently I have been approached by some of my close friends to join some chain marketing company.
Normally, chain marketing companies works on the principle of Pyramid Scheme.A pyramid scheme is a non-sustainable business model that involves the exchange . Pro-abortion. This section of the guide explores arguments in favour of abortion.
It looks at abortion from the ‘pro-choice’ stance and discusses the various philosophical, religious, ethical and moral issues involved. Comments → Why Ben Shapiro Is A Total Fraud. Ezekiel May 6, at am. Okay – a lot to take in, for someone who just recently started taking politics seriously, but damn.
This is an evisceration. Paul Kingsnorth is a writer and poet living in Cumbria, England. He is the author of several books, including the poetry collection Kidland and his fictional debut The Wake, winner of the Gordon Burn Prize and the Bookseller Book of the Year Award.
Kingsnorth is the cofounder and director of the Dark Mountain Project, a network of writers, artists, and thinkers.