This was my entry for the Commonwealth writing contest this year, which I didn't get anything for!
Hope you enjoy it. Fiction K - English - Words: Is this majority decision always right, however? Can the majority be trusted to make decisions and behave in ways that are considered "right", "moral", and "justified"? In my opinion, believing that the majority will always be right is a questionable and debatable belief, as it can often be a false assumption, and it should also be acknowledged that the majority itself will change over time, as will their beliefs.
A well-known example of poor decisions made by the majority is found in racism, or any other discriminatory thoughts and behaviours that have been, and are still, exhibited. For example, the violent and wide-spread racism found in history, such as that in American history, was an instance where the majority, in this case, an American-Caucasian majority, decided that they were the superior race, that they were to have privileges, while African-Americans, Chinese, Japanese, and Always essay majority right of different ethnicities, were to be of a lesser status.
This decision was a majority decision, but was it right? Was it right to pay Chinese workers five dollars less when working on the transcontinental railroad, and give them no food, simply because they were not white? Was it right to purposely not cure African-American men Always essay majority right had syphilis to study the effects of the disease?
The majority was not right in the past, in believing that everyone was equal, but that some people were more equal, and only because of changes over time have their opinions altered. These changes, in turn, were the only things that enabled society to regard people that were not of a Caucasian background as equals, changes that we would now say are "for the better".
The above example brings up another question: The definition of "what is right? In the past, "right" was packing Japanese-Canadians or Japanese-Americans into internment camps, because they were from the same country as the enemy in World War II.
This is considered to be discriminatory and unjustified today, but only because the majority has chosen to believe now that, no matter your ethnicity or appearance, you are a human being, and therefore deserving of the same rights as other human beings. However, in the time that those discriminatory acts were being performed, they were regarded as the correct thing to do: These changes in beliefs and reasoning slowly led to changes in what is considered "right".
Therefore, the definition of whether the majority was correct, even when performing acts of racism, is questionable and debatable, as during the time that their beliefs were employed, they were right to discriminate.
These values create the idea of what is "right" and what is "wrong". Therefore, the beliefs that are shared by the majority are the beliefs that are considered correct — in short, the majority separates what is right from what is wrong.
So, what if who the majority was had changed? What if what the majority believed was different? It should be remembered that these alterations have, in fact, occurred.
Therefore, they believed that their decision and actions were justified and the right thing to do, as well as there being less emphasis on human rights, resulting in few people thinking that the Japanese immigrants were entitled to certain rights. This mindset also contributed to the Japanese losing their property — everything was sold, including their land, farms, possessions in their homes as well as their houses, fishing boats, and more — by the government.
Since no, or at least few, objections were made against these actions, this decision was obviously right, because the majority had decided it was so. Also, it should be realized that the number of immigrants, and people of a non-Caucasian background in North America has increased, so that the majority, while still Caucasian, has been forced, in a way, to accommodate their beliefs and their actions to these changes in surroundings.
Before, the amount of non-Caucasians was not enough to be unavoidably noticeable, since all the Chinese could still be packed into "Chinatown", and all the African-Americans into the suburbs.
When the number of these minorities increased however, they sought more influence, more recognition, which they would slowly gain. Therefore, the context that the majority acted in is distinctly significant, and is the reason why I stated that believing the majority is always right is debatable — they were right at the time they acted, because they were the ones to distinguish acceptable behaviours from unacceptable ones, since the majority is the society, and society gives us our values.
Today, our society, along with many others, prides itself on being righteous, civilized, and intelligent, even though sometimes we display none of these qualities.The Right Choice Isn't Always Easy Essay Words | 4 Pages The Right Choice Isn’t Always Easy Birch Bayh, former Indiana Senator, grew up believing that women did not have a problem with rights.
Oct 06, · Majority Rule Minority rights have always been an extremely popular topic of discussion in the United States. However, the common definition of a minority has considerably changed since the writing of the Constitution. In conclusion, "the majority is always right" is a phrase that looks indisputable superficially.
However, when we delve deeper into questioning it, it is clear that there are too many arguments against the aforementioned expression to accept it as truth.
The vast majority of Americans now support civil rights and a woman's right to choose because of the same activist judges that so many conservatives love to complain about. The majority may be right and the minority may be wrong.
without the majority defining what is deemed to be right and what is deemed to be wrong. promote negative values. but when the majority is wrong.
but it cannot be always right. Majority rule is essential in a democracy and having limits does not contradict the majority’s power. The principles of majority rule can be upheld while the rights of minorities are protected as long as justice is maintained through the checks on majority factions and justified court rulings.